Libby Jenke
  • Publications
  • Tools
  • Teaching
  • Contact
  • Publications
    • Attention and Political Choice: A Foundation for Eye Tracking in Political Science
    • Beyond Single-Shot Designs: Repeated Treatments, Affective Polarization, and Democratic Norms
    • Prediction and Cumulative Knowledge in the Social Sciences
    • Affective Polarization Lowers Support for Democratic Norms of Restraint
    • Excludability in Psychological Experiments
    • Excludability is a Matter of Research Design: How to Conduct Credible Indirect Manipulations
    • Leadership Sexism: A New Sexism Measure to Predict Candidate Choice
    • Measurement of Affective Polarization: Two Problems and a Solution
    • Predicting Anti-Institutionalism in Members of Congress' Tweets
    • The Impact of Vice-Presidential Candidates' Race and Gender on Election Outcomes
    • Incorporating Eye Tracking Into the Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Conjoint Analysis
    • The (Un)reliability of Common Political Science Measures
    • Who's to Blame for Survey Instability: Respondents with Nonexistent Preferences or Researchers with Flawed Measures?
    • An Assessment of Citizens' Capacity for Prospective Issue Voting using Incentivized Forecasting
    • An Eye-Tracking Study of Gender Biased Information Acquisition in Candidate Evaluation
    • Odd Profiles in Conjoint Experimental Designs: Effects on Survey-Taking Attention and Behavior
    • Affective Polarization and Misinformation Belief
    • Attention Distribution as a Measure of Issue Salience
    • Introduction to the Special Issue: Innovations and Current Challenges in Experimental Methods
    • Using Eye-Tracking to Understand Decision-Making in Conjoint Experiments
    • Voter Preferences Reflect a Competition Between Policy and Identity
    • Theme and Variation: Historical Contingencies in the Causal Model of Inter-State Conflict
    • Turnout and the Calculus of Voting
    • Issues or Identity? Cognitive Foundations of Voter Choice
  • Tools
    • Eye Tracking Preregistration Template
    • EyeMetrics
    • PlotEyeFix
    • PlotEyeScan
  • Contact
  • Teaching

Who's to Blame for Survey Instability: Respondents with Nonexistent Preferences or Researchers with Flawed Measures?

Jun 1, 2025·
Libby Jenke
Libby Jenke
,
Gary King
Source Document
Libby Jenke
Authors
Libby Jenke
Associate Professor of Political Science
← The (Un)reliability of Common Political Science Measures Jun 1, 2025
An Assessment of Citizens' Capacity for Prospective Issue Voting using Incentivized Forecasting Jan 1, 2025 →

Created using GaryKing.org/mysite

Libby Jenke · Quantitative UX Researcher at Meta

Made with Hugo Blox Builder. Build yours →